Walker, Flynn respond to Trump impeachment process, inquiry vote

CN+R STAFF REPORTS
Posted 11/1/19

U.S. Rep. Mark Walker (R-N.C.), who represents Chatham County in Congress, criticized the vote on President Trump's impeachment inquiry in a press release Thursday, which was followed by a press release from Chatham County resident Angela Flynn, a Democrat who has begun campaigning to replace Walker in 2020.

The News + Record is worth reading!

We’re all about Chatham County, and we welcome you to our site. You can view up to 3 stories each month, then registration is required.

Please sign in below if you have an account. If not, please register here to get an account. It’s easy and takes just a minute.

Our staff works hard to bring good journalism, writing and story-telling to Chatham County. HELP US! You can get the News + Record mailed to you weekly by subscribing here.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Walker, Flynn respond to Trump impeachment process, inquiry vote

Thanks for reading Chatham County’s leading news source! Please consider supporting community journalism by subscribing to the News + Record – you can do so by clicking here.

Posted

The biggest headlines coming out of Washington, D.C., in recent weeks revolve around the impeachment hearings on President Donald Trump, and Chatham County’s Congressman, and the first candidate to announce opposition to him, have weighed in on the latest developments.

After a period of time of initial testimony, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 232-196 on Thursady to approve a resolution that would establish rules and open the impeachment inquiry process to public hearings, instead of the private ones that have been ongoing. Two Democrats joined all the Republicans in opposition, while the sole independent Congressman joined every other Democrat in voting against. Three Republican members and one Democrat did not cast a vote.

U.S. Rep. Mark Walker (R-N.C.), who represents Chatham County in Congress, criticized the vote on President Trump’s impeachment inquiry in a press release Thursday, which was followed by a press release from Chatham County resident Angela Flynn, a Democrat who has begun campaigning to replace Walker in 2020.

“After launching a sham impeachment by impetuous fiat, with a preordained result of removing the President of the United States and overturning an election, (House) Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi handed the reins over to (U.S. Rep.) Adam Schiff, allowing him to serve as a basement-dwelling judge, jury and executioner,” the statement said. “Now, House Democrats, in an admission of their tainted and secretive impeachment process, are trying to retroactively legalize their injustices and hysterics. We will not allow the people of our nation to be shut out and shielded from the facts while their President is undermined by an irrational mob.”

Walker has been one of the loudest critics of the impeachment process,  stating repeated criticism of the Democrats leading the inquiry. After multiple tweets and comments saying he wanted transparency in the process, Walker ended up voting against the resolution that was designed to provide it.

That was the basis of comments from Flynn, who works as a minister and stated in a press release that Walker “vote(d) against the bill that ensures the open and transparent process he says he wants.”

“Mark Walker’s continued brazen contempt for both oversight and the law is telling,” Flynn said in the release. “As a Member of Congress and someone who claims to be a fellow minister, Mark should hold himself above party politics to serve his entire constituency, act in a way worthy of being called a Christian, and uphold the Constitution and laws of our country.”

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
robert cherniak

I appreciate Angela Flynn's response to Mark Walker. It is clear that Mark uses talking points lifted from a playbook designed to detract from the real reason for the hearings. Did the President commit high crimes and misdemeanors as stated in the Constitution.

I quote his words......."We will not allow the people of our nation to be shut out and shielded from the facts while their President is undermined by an irrational mob.” Mark the purpose of public testimony and a public process is to give the people (us) of our nation an opportunity to decide. Mark, you should not prejudge the outcome by stating: "We will not allow the people of our nation to be shut out and shielded from the facts while their President is undermined by an irrational mob.” using the words "irrational mob" is inflammatory and does serious injustice to me and other concerned citizens.

Mark, explain how you can protect a President who has paid hush money to women, used his charity for his own self interest and has policies that separate young children from their parents at our border.

Saturday, November 9