Contention arises over Chatham Park tree plan

Posted 1/31/19

CN+R Staff Report

With a couple of Chatham Park’s major planning elements down, the Town of Pittsboro will next tackle tree protection.

The discussion began in earnest at a town board meeting …

The News + Record is worth reading!

We’re all about Chatham County, and we welcome you to our site. You can view up to 3 stories each month, then registration is required.

Please sign in below if you have an account. If not, please register here to get an account and an additional 7 stories each month. It’s easy and takes just a minute.

Our staff works hard to bring good journalism, writing and story-telling to Chatham County. HELP US! You can get the News + Record mailed to you weekly by subscribing here.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Contention arises over Chatham Park tree plan

Thanks for reading Chatham County’s leading news source! Please consider supporting community journalism by subscribing to the News + Record – you can do so by clicking here.


With a couple of Chatham Park’s major planning elements down, the Town of Pittsboro will next tackle tree protection.

The discussion began in earnest at a town board meeting on Jan. 14, and it started with Jeff Jones, the town’s planning director, expressing audible doubt over Chatham Park’s stated goals.

Chatham Park had given the town its plans for existing tree preservation and protection on the more-than-7,000-acre site in 2017. The town told Chatham Park at the time to find a different strategy.

Jones said that the developers’ new tree protection element, a set of ordinances, reflected the town’s Unified Development Ordinances, which are still in the draft phase. The new plan utilized percentages of tree protection based on tree coverage. Chatham Park’s plan, Jones said, most closely resembled that of the City of Durham.

The plan calls for Chatham Park to keep 20 percent of existing trees on residential lots and 10 percent on non-residential lots in most areas. In the Villages areas, the Park would retain 3 percent on residential lots and 10 percent in non-residential lots.

Jones said Durham has zero precent saved for tree protection in urban areas.

“Ten percent is better than zero,” Jones said, “but I question whether the applicant [Chatham Park] is truly meaning 10 percent or not.”

The comment was not addressed by the board, town staff or members from WithersRavenel, the architectural firm representing Chatham Park at the Jan. 14 meeting.

Commissioners Bett Wilson Foley and John Bonitz, both of whom have raised questions over Chatham Park in the past, expressed concerns over the element.

“Ten percent is such a fraction, and here Chatham Park is such an important watershed,” Foley said. “It seems like its numbers need to be higher than 10 and 20 percent.”

Commissioner Michael Fiocco said the current element plan would locate tree cover “off-site” and more street trees would be included, particularly in the non-residential areas. Bonitz said he appreciated the desire for flexibility, but argued for the multiple uses for tree cover.

“It’s not just aesthetic,” he said. “It cools the town, it reduces our energy bills. It also does help to protect the soil from sudden stormwater events. There’s a lot here, and there are significant values to protecting tree cover. I’m interested in seeing us present excellence in tree cover because I think that we have a lot to worry about in regards to more extreme weather events.”

The discussion continued at Pittsboro’s board meeting this past Monday, during which five residents addressed the board during the public comment session. The speakers expressed concerns that the percentage of tree canopy included in the additional elements for the Chatham Park development were inadequate and unacceptable. Speakers had concerns that replacement trees would not be enough to replace the mature wood and specimen trees that may be removed to allow the project.

The speaker comments sparked a discussion among the board members, particularly Bonitz and Fiocco; but there was no resolution or vote taken regarding the tree requirements. Attached to the agenda, however, as a “for your information” item, were recommendations for a tree protection ordinance. The item was not discussed; but the recommendations indicate that areas in the downtown Pittsboro region would require 15 percent tree canopy coverage while new mixed-used developments would require 30 percent tree canopy coverage. In addition, the percentage of tree canopy coverage would increase as lot sizes increased starting at 20 percent for lots under 10,000 square feet and moving upward to 60 percent canopy coverage for lots over 80,000 square feet, according to the recommendations.

The board will continue discussions over the next few meetings, with no current timetable for a decision.


No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment